[2023] Earn Quick And Easy Success With HPE6-A84 Dumps
Free HPE6-A84 pdf Files With Updated and Accurate Dumps Training
NEW QUESTION # 21
The customer needs a way for users to enroll new wired clients in Intune. The clients should have limited access that only lets them enroll and receive certificates. You plan to set up these rights in an AOS-CX role named "provision." The customer's security team dictates that you must limit these clients' Internet access to only the necessary sites. Your switch software supports IPv4 and IPv6 addresses for the rules applied in the "provision" role.
What should you recommend?
- A. Assigning the "provision" role to a VLAN and then setting up the rules within a Layer 2 access control list (ACL)
- B. Configuring the rules for the "provision" role with IPv6 addresses, which tend to be more stable
- C. Enabling tunneling to the MCs on the "provision" role and then setting up the privileges on the MCs
- D. Configuring the "provision" role as a downloadable user role (DUR) in CPPM
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
This is because a downloadable user role (DUR) is a feature that allows the switch to use a central ClearPass server to download user-roles to the switch for authenticated users12 A DUR can contain various attributes and rules that define the access level and privileges of the user, such as VLAN, ACL, PoE, reauthentication period, etc3 A DUR can also be customized and updated on the ClearPass server without requiring any changes on the switch1 A DUR can be used to create a "provision" role that allows users to enroll new wired clients in Intune. The
"provision" role can have limited access that only lets them enroll and receive certificates from the Intune service. The "provision" role can also have rules that restrict the Internet access of the users to only the necessary sites, such as the Intune portal and the certificate authority. The rules can be based on IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, depending on the network configuration and preference2
A: Configuring the rules for the "provision" role with IPv6 addresses, which tend to be more stable. This is not a valid recommendation because it does not address how to create and apply the "provision" role on the switch. Moreover, IPv6 addresses do not necessarily tend to be more stable than IPv4 addresses, as both protocols have their own advantages and disadvantages4
B: Enabling tunneling to the MCs on the "provision" role and then setting up the privileges on the MCs. This is not a valid recommendation because it does not explain how to enable tunneling or what MCs are. Moreover, tunneling is a technique that encapsulates one network protocol within another, which adds complexity and overhead to the network communication5
D: Assigning the "provision" role to a VLAN and then setting up the rules within a Layer 2 access control list (ACL). This is not a valid recommendation because it does not explain how to assign a role to a VLAN or how to create a Layer 2 ACL on the switch. Moreover, a Layer 2 ACL is limited in its filtering capabilities, as it can only match on MAC addresses or Ethernet types, which might not be sufficient for restricting Internet access to specific sites
NEW QUESTION # 22
You are configuring gateway IDS/IPS settings in Aruba Central.
For which reason would you set the Fail Strategy to Bypass?
- A. To tell gateways to stop enforcing IDS/IPS policies if they lose connectivity to the Internet
- B. To permit traffic if the IPS engine falls to inspect It
- C. To avoid wasting IPS engine resources on filtering traffic for unauthenticated clients
- D. To enable the gateway to honor the allowlist settings configured in IDS/IPS policies
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
The Fail Strategy is a configuration option for the IPS mode of inspection on Aruba gateways. It defines the action to be taken when the IPS engine crashes and cannot inspect the traffic. There are two possible options for the Fail Strategy: Bypass and Block1 If you set the Fail Strategy to Bypass, you are telling the gateway to allow the traffic to flow without inspection when the IPS engine fails. This option ensures that there is no disruption in the network connectivity, but it also exposes the network to potential threats that are not detected or prevented by the IPS engine1 If you set the Fail Strategy to Block, you are telling the gateway to stop the traffic flow until the IPS engine resumes inspection. This option ensures that there is no compromise in the network security, but it also causes a loss of network connectivity for the duration of the IPS engine failure1
NEW QUESTION # 23
You need to install a certificate on a standalone Aruba Mobility Controller (MC). The MC will need to use the certificate for the Web UI and for implementing RadSec with Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager. You have been given a certificate with these settings:
Subject: CN=mc41.site94.example.com
* No SANs
* Issuer: CN=ca41.example.com
EKUs: Server Authentication, Client Authentication
What issue does this certificate have for the purposes for which the certificate is intended?
- A. It lacks a DNS SAN.
- B. It is issued by a private CA.
- C. It specifies domain info in the CN field instead of the DC field.
- D. It has conflicting EKUs.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
A DNS SAN (Subject Alternative Name) is an extension of the X.509 certificate standard that allows specifying additional hostnames or IP addresses that the certificate can be used for. A DNS SAN is useful for validating the identity of the server or client that presents the certificate, especially when the common name (CN) field does not match the hostname or IP address of the server or client.
In this case, the certificate has a CN of mc41.site94.example.com, which is the fully qualified domain name (FQDN) of the standalone Aruba Mobility Controller (MC). However, this CN may not match the hostname or IP address that the MC uses for the Web UI or for implementing RadSec with Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager. For example, if the MC uses a different FQDN, such as mc41.example.com, or an IP address, such as 192.168.1.41, for these purposes, then the certificate would not be valid for them. Therefore, the certificate should have a DNS SAN that includes all the possible hostnames or IP addresses that the MC may use for the Web UI and RadSec.
NEW QUESTION # 24
Refer to the exhibit.
A customer requires protection against ARP poisoning in VLAN 4. Below are listed all settings for VLAN 4 and the VLAN 4 associated physical interfaces on the AOS-CX access layer switch:
What is one issue with this configuration?
- A. ARP proxy is not enabled on VLAN 4.
- B. LAG 1 is configured as trusted for ARP inspection but should be untrusted.
- C. DHCP snooping is not enabled on VLAN 4.
- D. Edge ports are not configured as untrusted for ARP inspection.
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 25
Refer to the scenario.
A customer has an Aruba ClearPass cluster. The customer has AOS-CX switches that implement 802.1X authentication to ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM).
Switches are using local port-access policies.
The customer wants to start tunneling wired clients that pass user authentication only to an Aruba gateway cluster. The gateway cluster should assign these clients to the "eth-internet" role. The gateway should also handle assigning clients to their VLAN, which is VLAN 20.
The plan for the enforcement policy and profiles is shown below:
The gateway cluster has two gateways with these IP addresses:
* Gateway 1
o VLAN 4085 (system IP) = 10.20.4.21
o VLAN 20 (users) = 10.20.20.1
o VLAN 4094 (WAN) = 198.51.100.14
* Gateway 2
o VLAN 4085 (system IP) = 10.20.4.22
o VLAN 20 (users) = 10.20.20.2
o VLAN 4094 (WAN) = 198.51.100.12
* VRRP on VLAN 20 = 10.20.20.254
The customer requires high availability for the tunnels between the switches and the gateway cluster. If one gateway falls, the other gateway should take over its tunnels. Also, the switch should be able to discover the gateway cluster regardless of whether one of the gateways is in the cluster.
Assume that you have configured the correct UBT zone and port-access role settings. However, the solution is not working.
What else should you make sure to do?
- A. Create a new VLAN on the AOS-CX switch and configure that VLAN as the UBT client VLAN.
- B. Assign VLAN 20 as the access VLAN on any edge ports to which tunneled clients might connect.
- C. Assign sufficient VIA licenses to the gateways based on the number of wired clients that will connect.
- D. Change the port-access auth-mode mode to client-mode on any edge ports to which tunneled clients might connect.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The correct answer is B. Create a new VLAN on the AOS-CX switch and configure that VLAN as the UBT client VLAN.
User-based tunneling (UBT) is a feature that allows the AOS-CX switches to tunnel the traffic from wired clients to a mobility gateway cluster, where they can be assigned a role and a VLAN based on their authentication and authorization 1. To enable UBT, the switches need to have a UBT zone configured with the IP addresses of the gateways, and a UBT client VLAN configured with the ubt-client-vlan command 2.
The UBT client VLAN is a special VLAN that is used to encapsulate the traffic from the tunneled clients before sending it to the gateways. The UBT client VLAN must be different from any other VLANs used on the switch or the network, and it must not be assigned to any ports or interfaces on the switch 2. The UBT client VLAN is only used internally by the switch for UBT, and it is not visible to the clients or the gateways.
In this scenario, the customer wants to tunnel the clients that pass user authentication to the gateway cluster, where they will be assigned to VLAN 20. Therefore, the switch must have a UBT client VLAN configured that is different from VLAN 20 or any other VLANs on the network. For example, the switch can use VLAN
4000 as the UBT client VLAN, as shown in one of the web search results 3. The switch must also have a UBT zone configured with the system IP addresses of the gateways as the primary and backup controllers, as explained in question 3.
The other options are not correct or relevant for this issue:
Option A is not correct because assigning VLAN 20 as the access VLAN on any edge ports to which tunneled clients might connect would conflict with UBT. The access VLAN is the VLAN that is assigned to untagged traffic on a port, and it is used for local switching on the switch 4. If VLAN 20 is assigned as the access VLAN, then the traffic from the clients will not be tunneled to the gateways, but rather switched locally on VLAN 20. This would defeat the purpose of UBT and cause inconsistency in role and VLAN assignment.
Option C is not correct because VIA licenses are not required for UBT. VIA licenses are required for enabling VPN services on Aruba Mobility Controllers for remote access clients using Aruba Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) software . VIA licenses are not related to UBT or wired clients.
Option D is not correct because changing the port-access auth-mode mode to client-mode on any edge ports to which tunneled clients might connect would not affect UBT. The port-access auth-mode mode determines how a port handles authentication requests from multiple clients connected to a single port .
Client-mode is the default mode that allows only one client per port, while multi-client-mode allows multiple clients per port. The port-access auth-mode mode does not affect how UBT works or how traffic is tunneled from a port.
NEW QUESTION # 26
Refer to the exhibit.
You have been given this certificate to install on a ClearPass server for the RADIUS/EAP and RadSec usages.
What is one issue?
- A. The certificate does not have an IP subject alternative name
- B. The certificate does not have a URI subject alternative name
- C. The certificate has a wildcard in the subject common name.
- D. The certificate uses a fully qualified the '.local" domain name.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 27
Refer to the exhibit.
Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) is using the settings shown in the exhibit. You reference the tag shown in the exhibit in enforcement policies related to NASes of several types, including Aruba APs, Aruba gateways, and AOS-CX switches.
What should you do to ensure that clients are reclassified and receive the correct treatment based on the tag?
- A. Change the RADIUS action to [Aruba Wireless - Bounce Switch Port] which is supported by all the NASes in question.
- B. Enable profiling in each service using one of these enforcement profiles. Set the profiling action to the correct one for the NASes using that service.
- C. Change the RADIUS action to [Aruba Wireless -Terminate Session] which is supported by all the NASes in question.
- D. Set the Tags Update Action to No Action. Then instead enable the RADIUS CoAs using enforcement profiles in the rules that match clients with the tag shown in the exhibit.
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 28
Refer to the scenario.
A customer is migrating from on-prem AD to Azure AD as its sole domain solution. The customer also manages both wired and wireless devices with Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Intune).
The customer wants to improve security for the network edge. You are helping the customer design a ClearPass deployment for this purpose. Aruba network devices will authenticate wireless and wired clients to an Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) cluster (which uses version 6.10).
The customer has several requirements for authentication. The clients should only pass EAP-TLS authentication if a query to Azure AD shows that they have accounts in Azure AD. To further refine the clients' privileges, ClearPass also should use information collected by Intune to make access control decisions.
Assume that the Azure AD deployment has the proper prerequisites established.
You are planning the CPPM authentication source that you will reference as the authentication source in
802.1X services.
How should you set up this authentication source?
- A. As HTTP type, referencing the Intune extension
- B. As Active Directory type
- C. As Kerberos type
- D. AS HTTP type, referencing Azure AD's FODN
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 29
You are working with a developer to design a custom NAE script for a customer. You are helping the developer find the correct REST API resource to monitor.
Refer to the exhibit below.
What should you do before proceeding?
- A. Go to the v1 API documentation interface instead of the v10.10 interface.
- B. Make sure that your browser is set up to store authentication tokens and cookies.
- C. Use your Aruba passport account and collect a token to use when trying out API calls.
- D. Enable the switch to listen to REST API calls on the default VRF.
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 30
Refer to the scenario.
A customer has an AOS10 architecture that is managed by Aruba Central. Aruba infrastructure devices authenticate clients to an Aruba ClearPass cluster.
In Aruba Central, you are examining network traffic flows on a wireless IoT device that is categorized as
"Raspberry Pi" clients. You see SSH traffic. You then check several more wireless IoT clients and see that they are sending SSH also.
You want a fast way to find a list of all the IoT clients that have used SSH.
What step can you take?
- A. Use Central's Live Events monitoring tool to detect which clients meet the desired criteria.
- B. Use Central's Gateway IDS/IPS Security Dashboard to search for SSH events and sources.
- C. Run a search for SSH traffic and loT client IDs in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager's (CPPM's) accounting information.
- D. Create and apply a Central client profile tag that selects the SSH application and the clients' category.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
This is because the Live Events monitoring tool is a feature that allows you to view and filter real-time events and alerts from your network devices and clients on Aruba Central. You can use the Live Events monitoring tool to detect which IoT clients have used SSH by applying the following filters:
Category: IoT
Application: SSH
The Live Events monitoring tool will then display a list of all the IoT clients that have used SSH, along with other information such as their IP address, MAC address, hostname, SSID, AP name, etc. You can also export the list as a CSV file for further analysis or reporting.
A: Create and apply a Central client profile tag that selects the SSH application and the clients' category. This is not the fastest way to find a list of all the IoT clients that have used SSH because creating and applying a client profile tag is a process that involves several steps and might take some time to take effect. A client profile tag is a feature that allows you to group and classify clients based on various criteria, such as device type, OS, category, application, etc. To create and apply a client profile tag that selects the SSH application and the clients' category, you need to do the following:
Navigate to Clients > Client Profile Tags on Aruba Central.
Click Add Tag and enter a name and description for the tag.
Click Add Rule and select Application as the attribute and SSH as the value.
Click Add Rule again and select Category as the attribute and IoT as the value.
Click Save to create the tag.
Navigate to Clients > Client List on Aruba Central.
Select the clients that you want to apply the tag to and click Assign Tag.
Select the tag that you created and click Apply.
After applying the tag, you can then filter the client list by the tag name and see a list of all the IoT clients that have used SSH. However, this method might not be as fast or accurate as using the Live Events monitoring tool, as it depends on how often the client profile tags are updated and synchronized with Aruba Central.
B: Run a search for SSH traffic and loT client IDs in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager's (CPPM's) accounting information. This is not the fastest way to find a list of all the IoT clients that have used SSH because running a search in CPPM's accounting information is a process that involves accessing another system and querying a large amount of data. Accounting information is a feature that allows CPPM to collect and store data about network sessions, such as start time, end time, duration, bytes sent/received, etc. To run a search for SSH traffic and IoT client IDs in CPPM's accounting information, you need to do the following:
Log in to CPPM and navigate to Monitoring > Live Monitoring > Accounting.
Click on Advanced Search and enter SSH as the value for Service Name.
Click on Add Filter and enter IoT as the value for Endpoint Category.
Click on Search to run the query.
The query will then return a list of all the network sessions that involved SSH traffic and IoT clients. However, this method might not be as fast or convenient as using the Live Events monitoring tool, as it requires logging in to another system and searching through a large amount of data that might not be relevant or current.
D: Use Central's Gateway IDS/IPS Security Dashboard to search for SSH events and sources. This is not a valid way to find a list of all the IoT clients that have used SSH because the Gateway IDS/IPS Security Dashboard is a feature that only applies to wired network devices connected to Aruba gateways, not wireless devices connected to Aruba APs. The Gateway IDS/IPS Security Dashboard is a feature that allows you to monitor and manage security events and alerts from your wired network devices on Aruba Central. You can use the Gateway IDS/IPS Security Dashboard to search for security events related to SSH, such as brute force attacks or unauthorized access attempts, but not for normal SSH traffic from wireless IoT devices. Therefore, this method will not help you find a list of all the IoT clients that have used SSH.
NEW QUESTION # 31
Several AOS-CX switches are responding to SNMPv2 GET requests for the public community. The customer only permits SNMPv3. You have asked a network admin to fix this problem. The admin says, "I tried to remove the community, but the CLI output an error." What should you recommend to remediate the vulnerability and meet the customer's requirements?
- A. Adding an SNMP community with a long random name
- B. Enabling SNMPv3, which implicitly disables SNMPv1/v2
- C. Setting the snmp-server settings to "snmpv3-only"
- D. Enabling control plane policing to automatically drop SNMP GET requests
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 32
Refer to the scenario.
A customer has an AOS10 architecture that is managed by Aruba Central. Aruba infrastructure devices authenticate clients to an Aruba ClearPass cluster.
In Aruba Central, you are examining network traffic flows on a wireless IoT device that is categorized as
"Raspberry Pi" clients. You see SSH traffic. You then check several more wireless IoT clients and see that they are sending SSH also.
You want an easy way to communicate the information that an IoT client has used SSH to Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM).
What step should you take?
- A. On CPPM enable Device Insight integration.
- B. On Central configure APs and gateways to use CPPM as the RADIUS accounting server.
- C. On Central set up CPPM as a Webhook application.
- D. On CPPM create an Endpoint Context Server that points to the Central API.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
This is because an Endpoint Context Server (ECS) is a feature that allows ClearPass to receive contextual information from external sources, such as Aruba Central, and use it for policy enforcement and reporting. An ECS can be configured to point to the Aruba Central API and fetch data such as device type, category, OS, applications, traffic flows, etc.
An ECS can be used to communicate the information that an IoT client has used SSH to Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). The ECS can query the Aruba Central API and retrieve the network traffic flows of the wireless IoT devices that are categorized as "Raspberry Pi" clients. The ECS can then filter the traffic flows by the SSH protocol and send the relevant information to CPPM. CPPM can then use this information for policy decisions, such as allowing or denying SSH access, or triggering alerts or actions.
B: On CPPM enable Device Insight integration. This is not a valid step because Device Insight is a feature that allows ClearPass to discover, profile, and fingerprint devices on the network using deep packet inspection (DPI) and machine learning (ML). Device Insight does not communicate with Aruba Central or receive information from it. Moreover, Device Insight might not be able to detect SSH traffic on encrypted wireless IoT devices without decrypting it first.
C: On Central configure APs and gateways to use CPPM as the RADIUS accounting server. This is not a valid step because RADIUS accounting is a feature that allows network devices to send periodic updates about the status and activity of authenticated users or devices to a RADIUS server, such as CPPM. RADIUS accounting does not communicate with Aruba Central or receive information from it. Moreover, RADIUS accounting might not be able to capture SSH traffic on wireless IoT devices without inspecting it first.
D: On Central set up CPPM as a Webhook application. This is not a valid step because Webhook is a feature that allows Aruba Central to send notifications or events to external applications or services using HTTP requests. Webhook does not communicate with CPPM or send information to it. Moreover, Webhook might not be able to send SSH traffic information on wireless IoT devices without filtering it first.
NEW QUESTION # 33
Refer to the scenario.
# Introduction to the customer
You are helping a company add Aruba ClearPass to their network, which uses Aruba network infrastructure devices.
The company currently has a Windows domain and Windows CA. The Window CA issues certificates to domain computers, domain users, and servers such as domain controllers. An example of a certificate issued by the Windows CA is shown here.

The company is in the process of adding Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Intune) to manage its mobile clients.
The customer is maintaining the on-prem AD for now and uses Azure AD Connect to sync with Azure AD.
# Requirements for issuing certificates to mobile clients
The company wants to use ClearPass Onboard to deploy certificates automatically to mobile clients enrolled in Intune. During this process, Onboard should communicate with Azure AD to validate the clients. High availability should also be provided for this scenario; in other words, clients should be able to get certificates from Subscriber 2 if Subscriber 1 is down.
The Intune admins intend to create certificate profiles that include a UPN SAN with the UPN of the user who enrolled the device.
# Requirements for authenticating clients
The customer requires all types of clients to connect and authenticate on the same corporate SSID.
The company wants CPPM to use these authentication methods:
* EAP-TLS to authenticate users on mobile clients registered in Intune
* TEAR, with EAP-TLS as the inner method to authenticate Windows domain computers and the users on them To succeed, EAP-TLS (standalone or as a TEAP method) clients must meet these requirements:
Their certificate is valid and is not revoked, as validated by OCSP
The client's username matches an account in AD
# Requirements for assigning clients to roles
After authentication, the customer wants the CPPM to assign clients to ClearPass roles based on the following rules:
* Clients with certificates issued by Onboard are assigned the "mobile-onboarded" role
* Clients that have passed TEAP Method 1 are assigned the "domain-computer" role Clients in the AD group "Medical" are assigned the "medical-staff" role Clients in the AD group "Reception" are assigned to the "reception-staff" role The customer requires CPPM to assign authenticated clients to AOS firewall roles as follows:
* Assign medical staff on mobile-onboarded clients to the "medical-mobile" firewall role
* Assign other mobile-onboarded clients to the "mobile-other" firewall role
* Assign medical staff on domain computers to the "medical-domain" firewall role
* All reception staff on domain computers to the "reception-domain" firewall role
* All domain computers with no valid user logged in to the "computer-only" firewall role
* Deny other clients access
# Other requirements
Communications between ClearPass servers and on-prem AD domain controllers must be encrypted.
# Network topology
For the network infrastructure, this customer has Aruba APs and Aruba gateways, which are managed by Central. APs use tunneled WLANs, which tunnel traffic to the gateway cluster. The customer also has AOS-CX switches that are not managed by Central at this point.
# ClearPass cluster IP addressing and hostnames
A customer's ClearPass cluster has these IP addresses:
* Publisher = 10.47.47.5
* Subscriber 1 = 10.47.47.6
* Subscriber 2 = 10.47.47.7
* Virtual IP with Subscriber 1 and Subscriber 2 = 10.47.47.8
The customer's DNS server has these entries
* cp.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.5
* cps1.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.6
* cps2.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.7
* radius.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.8
* onboard.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.8
The customer has now decided that it needs CPPM to assign certain mobile-onboarded devices to a
"nurse-call" AOS user role. These are mobile-onboarded devices that are communicating with IP address
10.1.18.12 using port 4343.
What are the prerequisites for fulfilling this requirement?
- A. Creating a tag on Central to select the proper destination connection and integrating CPPM with Device Insight
- B. Creating server-based role assignment rules on gateways that apply roles to clients based on traffic destinations
- C. Setting up traffic classes and role mapping rules within Central's global settings
- D. Creating server-based role assignment rules on APs that apply roles to clients based on traffic destinations
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 34
A company has Aruba gateways that are Implementing gateway IDS/IPS in IDS mode. The customer complains that admins are receiving too frequent of repeat email notifications for the same threat. The threat itself might be one that the admins should investigate, but the customer does not want the email notification to repeat as often.
Which setting should you adjust in Aruba Central?
- A. The allowlist settings in the IDS policy
- B. The IDS policy setting (strict, medium, or lenient)
- C. Report scheduling settings
- D. Alert duration and threshold settings
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
Alert duration and threshold settings are used to control how often and under what conditions email notifications are sent for gateway IDS/IPS events 1. By adjusting these settings, the customer can reduce the frequency of repeat email notifications for the same threat, while still being informed of any critical or new threats.
To adjust the alert duration and threshold settings in Aruba Central, the customer can follow these steps 1:
In the Aruba Central app, set the filter to Global, a group, or a device.
Under Analyze, click Alerts & Events.
Click the Config icon to open the Alert Severities & Notifications page.
Select the Gateway IDS/IPS tab to view the alert categories and severities for gateway IDS/IPS events.
Click on an alert category to expand it and view the alert duration and threshold settings for each severity level.
Enter a value in minutes for the alert duration. This is the time period during which the alert is active and email notifications are sent.
Enter a value for the alert threshold. This is the number of times the alert must be triggered within the alert duration before an email notification is sent.
Click Save.
By increasing the alert duration and/or threshold values, the customer can reduce the number of email notifications for recurring threats, as they will only be sent when the threshold is reached within the duration.
For example, if the customer sets the alert duration to 60 minutes and the alert threshold to 10 for a Critical severity level, then an email notification will only be sent if the same threat occurs 10 times or more within an hour.
NEW QUESTION # 35
You want to use Device Insight tags as conditions within CPPM role mapping or enforcement policy rules.
What guidelines should you follow?
- A. Create an HTTP authentication source to the Central API that queries for the tags. To use that source as the type for rule conditions, add it an authorization source for the service in question.
- B. Use the Endpoints Repository type for the rule conditions; Add Endpoints Repository as a secondary authentication source for services that use policies with these rules.
- C. Use the Application type for the rule conditions; no extra authorization source is required for services that use policies with these rules.
- D. Use the Endpoint type for the rule conditions; no extra authorization source is required for services that use policies with these rules.
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 36
Refer to the exhibit.
Which security issue is possibly indicated by this traffic capture?
- A. An ARP poisoning or man-in-the-middle attempt by the device at 94:60:d5:bf:36:40
- B. A command and control channel established with DNS tunneling
- C. An attempt at a DoS attack by a device acting as an unauthorized DNS server
- D. A port scan being run on the 10.1.7.0/24 subnet
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
DNS tunneling is a technique that abuses the DNS protocol to tunnel data or commands between a compromised host and an attacker's server. DNS tunneling can be used to establish a command and control channel, which allows the attacker to remotely control the malware or exfiltrate data from the infected host1 The traffic capture in the exhibit shows some signs of DNS tunneling. The source IP address is 10.1.7.2, which is likely an internal host behind a firewall. The destination IP address is 8.8.8.8, which is a public DNS resolver. The DNS queries are for subdomains of badsite.com, which is likely a malicious domain registered by the attacker. The subdomains have long and random names, such as
0x2a0x2a0x2a0x2a0x2a0x2a0x2a0x2a.badsite.com, which could be used to encode data or commands. The DNS responses have large sizes, such as 512 bytes, which could be used to carry data or commands back to the host2
NEW QUESTION # 37
Refer to the scenario.
This customer is enforcing 802.1X on AOS-CX switches to Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). The customer wants switches to download role settings from CPPM. The "reception-domain" role must have these settings:
- Assigns clients to VLAN 14 on switch 1, VLAN 24 on switch 2, and so on.
- Filters client traffic as follows:
- Clients are permitted full access to 10.1.5.0/24 and the Internet
- Clients are denied access to 10.1.0.0/16
The switch topology is shown here:
How should you configure the VLAN setting for the reception role?
- A. Create a separate enforcement profile with a different VLAN ID for each switch. Add all profiles to the profile list in the appropriate enforcement policy rule.
- B. Assign a consistent name to VLAN 14, 24, or 34 on each access layer switch and reference that name in the enforcement profile VLAN settings.
- C. Configure the enforcement profile as a downloadable role, but specify only the role name and leave the VLAN undefined. Then define a 'reception' role with the correct VLAN setting on each individual access layer switch.
- D. Assign a number-based ID to the access layer switches. Then use this variable in the enforcement profile VLAN settings: %(NAS-ID]4.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 38
Refer to the scenario.
A customer has an AOS10 architecture that is managed by Aruba Central. Aruba infrastructure devices authenticate clients to an Aruba ClearPass cluster.
In Aruba Central, you are examining network traffic flows on a wireless IoT device that is categorized as
"Raspberry Pi" clients. You see SSH traffic. You then check several more wireless IoT clients and see that they are sending SSH also.
You want a fast way to find a list of all the IoT clients that have used SSH.
What step can you take?
- A. Create and apply a Central client profile tag that selects the SSH application and the clients' category.
- B. Use Central's Gateway IDS/IPS Security Dashboard to search for SSH events and sources.
- C. Run a search for SSH traffic and loT client IDs in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager's (CPPM's) accounting information.
- D. Use Central's Live Events monitoring tool to detect which clients meet the desired criteria.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 39
Refer to the scenario.
# Introduction to the customer
You are helping a company add Aruba ClearPass to their network, which uses Aruba network infrastructure devices.
The company currently has a Windows domain and Windows CA. The Window CA issues certificates to domain computers, domain users, and servers such as domain controllers. An example of a certificate issued by the Windows CA is shown here.

The company is in the process of adding Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Intune) to manage its mobile clients.
The customer is maintaining the on-prem AD for now and uses Azure AD Connect to sync with Azure AD.
# Requirements for issuing certificates to mobile clients
The company wants to use ClearPass Onboard to deploy certificates automatically to mobile clients enrolled in Intune. During this process, Onboard should communicate with Azure AD to validate the clients. High availability should also be provided for this scenario; in other words, clients should be able to get certificates from Subscriber 2 if Subscriber 1 is down.
The Intune admins intend to create certificate profiles that include a UPN SAN with the UPN of the user who enrolled the device.
# Requirements for authenticating clients
The customer requires all types of clients to connect and authenticate on the same corporate SSID.
The company wants CPPM to use these authentication methods:
* EAP-TLS to authenticate users on mobile clients registered in Intune
* TEAR, with EAP-TLS as the inner method to authenticate Windows domain computers and the users on them To succeed, EAP-TLS (standalone or as a TEAP method) clients must meet these requirements:
Their certificate is valid and is not revoked, as validated by OCSP
The client's username matches an account in AD
# Requirements for assigning clients to roles
After authentication, the customer wants the CPPM to assign clients to ClearPass roles based on the following rules:
* Clients with certificates issued by Onboard are assigned the "mobile-onboarded" role
* Clients that have passed TEAP Method 1 are assigned the "domain-computer" role Clients in the AD group "Medical" are assigned the "medical-staff" role Clients in the AD group "Reception" are assigned to the "reception-staff" role The customer requires CPPM to assign authenticated clients to AOS firewall roles as follows:
* Assign medical staff on mobile-onboarded clients to the "medical-mobile" firewall role
* Assign other mobile-onboarded clients to the "mobile-other" firewall role
* Assign medical staff on domain computers to the "medical-domain" firewall role
* All reception staff on domain computers to the "reception-domain" firewall role
* All domain computers with no valid user logged in to the "computer-only" firewall role
* Deny other clients' access
# Other requirements
Communications between ClearPass servers and on-prem AD domain controllers must be encrypted.
# Network topology
For the network infrastructure, this customer has Aruba APs and Aruba gateways, which are managed by Central. APs use tunneled WLANs, which tunnel traffic to the gateway cluster. The customer also has AOS-CX switches that are not managed by Central at this point.
# ClearPass cluster IP addressing and hostnames
A customer's ClearPass cluster has these IP addresses:
* Publisher = 10.47.47.5
* Subscriber 1 = 10.47.47.6
* Subscriber 2 = 10.47.47.7
* Virtual IP with Subscriber 1 and Subscriber 2 = 10.47.47.8
The customer's DNS server has these entries
* cp.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.5
* cps1.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.6
* cps2.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.7
* radius.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.8
* onboard.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.8
You have created a role mapping policy as shown in the exhibits below.
What is one change that you need to make to this policy?
- A. Change the rules evaluation mechanism to first applicable.
- B. In rule 1 change Subject-CN to Issuer-CN.
- C. Change the default role to 'mobile-onboarded*
- D. Move rules 2 and 3 to the top of the list.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 40
Refer to the scenario.
# Introduction to the customer
You are helping a company add Aruba ClearPass to their network, which uses Aruba network infrastructure devices.
The company currently has a Windows domain and Windows CA. The Window CA issues certificates to domain computers, domain users, and servers such as domain controllers. An example of a certificate issued by the Windows CA is shown here.

The company is in the process of adding Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Intune) to manage its mobile clients.
The customer is maintaining the on-prem AD for now and uses Azure AD Connect to sync with Azure AD.
# Requirements for issuing certificates to mobile clients
The company wants to use ClearPass Onboard to deploy certificates automatically to mobile clients enrolled in Intune. During this process, Onboard should communicate with Azure AD to validate the clients. High availability should also be provided for this scenario; in other words, clients should be able to get certificates from Subscriber 2 if Subscriber 1 is down.
The Intune admins intend to create certificate profiles that include a UPN SAN with the UPN of the user who enrolled the device.
# Requirements for authenticating clients
The customer requires all types of clients to connect and authenticate on the same corporate SSID.
The company wants CPPM to use these authentication methods:
* EAP-TLS to authenticate users on mobile clients registered in Intune
* TEAR, with EAP-TLS as the inner method to authenticate Windows domain computers and the users on them To succeed, EAP-TLS (standalone or as a TEAP method) clients must meet these requirements:
Their certificate is valid and is not revoked, as validated by OCSP
The client's username matches an account in AD
# Requirements for assigning clients to roles
After authentication, the customer wants the CPPM to assign clients to ClearPass roles based on the following rules:
* Clients with certificates issued by Onboard are assigned the "mobile-onboarded" role
* Clients that have passed TEAP Method 1 are assigned the "domain-computer" role Clients in the AD group "Medical" are assigned the "medical-staff" role Clients in the AD group "Reception" are assigned to the "reception-staff" role The customer requires CPPM to assign authenticated clients to AOS firewall roles as follows:
* Assign medical staff on mobile-onboarded clients to the "medical-mobile" firewall role
* Assign other mobile-onboarded clients to the "mobile-other" firewall role
* Assign medical staff on domain computers to the "medical-domain" firewall role
* All reception staff on domain computers to the "reception-domain" firewall role
* All domain computers with no valid user logged in to the "computer-only" firewall role
* Deny other clients access
# Other requirements
Communications between ClearPass servers and on-prem AD domain controllers must be encrypted.
# Network topology
For the network infrastructure, this customer has Aruba APs and Aruba gateways, which are managed by Central. APs use tunneled WLANs, which tunnel traffic to the gateway cluster. The customer also has AOS-CX switches that are not managed by Central at this point.
# ClearPass cluster IP addressing and hostnames
A customer's ClearPass cluster has these IP addresses:
* Publisher = 10.47.47.5
* Subscriber 1 = 10.47.47.6
* Subscriber 2 = 10.47.47.7
* Virtual IP with Subscriber 1 and Subscriber 2 = 10.47.47.8
The customer's DNS server has these entries
* cp.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.5
* cps1.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.6
* cps2.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.7
* radius.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.8
* onboard.acnsxtest.com = 10.47.47.8
You have imported the root certificate for the Windows CA to the ClearPass CA Trust list.
Which usages should you add to it based on the scenario requirements?
- A. EAP and AD/LDAP Server
- B. Radsec and Aruba infrastructure
- C. EAP and Radsec
- D. LDAP and Aruba infrastructure
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 41
Refer to the scenario.
A customer requires these rights for clients in the "medical-mobile" AOS firewall role on Aruba Mobility Controllers (MCs):
* Permitted to receive IP addresses with DHCP
* Permitted access to DNS services from 10.8.9.7 and no other server
* Permitted access to all subnets in the 10.1.0.0/16 range except denied access to 10.1.12.0/22 Denied access to other 10.0.0.0/8 subnets
* Permitted access to the Internet
Denied access to the WLAN for a period of time if they send any SSH traffic Denied access to the WLAN for a period of time if they send any Telnet traffic Denied access to all high-risk websites External devices should not be permitted to initiate sessions with "medical-mobile" clients, only send return traffic.
The exhibits below show the configuration for the role.
What setting not shown in the exhibit must you check to ensure that the requirements of the scenario are met?
- A. That stateful handling of traffic is enabled globally on the MCs' firewalls and on the medical-mobile role.
- B. That denylisting is enabled globally on the MCs' firewalls
- C. That the MCs are assigned RF Protect licenses
- D. That AppRF and WebCC are enabled globally and on the medical-mobile role
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
AppRF and WebCC are features that allow the MCs to classify and control application traffic and web content based on predefined or custom categories 12. These features are required to meet the scenario requirements of denying access to all high-risk websites and denying access to the WLAN for a period of time if they send any SSH or Telnet traffic.
To enable AppRF and WebCC, you need to check the following settings:
On the global level, you need to enable AppRF and WebCC under Configuration > Services > AppRF and Configuration > Services On the role level, you need to enable AppRF and WebCC under Configuration > Security > Access Control > Roles > medical-mobile > AppRF and Configuration > Security > Access Control > Roles > medical-mobile > WebCC, respectively 12.
You also need to make sure that the MCs have valid licenses for AppRF and WebCC, which are included in the ArubaOS PEFNG license 3.
NEW QUESTION # 42
When would you implement BPDU protection on an AOS-CX switch port versus BPDU filtering?
- A. Use BPDU protection on edge ports to prevent rogue devices from connecting; use BPDU filtering on inter-switch ports for specialized use cases.
- B. Use BPDU protection on edge ports to permanently lock out rogue devices; use BPDU filtering on edge ports to temporarily lock out rogue devices.
- C. Use BPDU protection on inter-switch ports to ensure that they are selected as root; use BPDU filtering on edge ports to prevent rogue devices from connecting.
- D. Use BPDU protection on edge ports to protect against rogue devices when the switch implements MSTP; use BPDU filtering to protect against rogue devices when the switch implements PVSTP+.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
BPDU (Bridge Protocol Data Unit) is a message that is exchanged between switches to maintain the spanning tree topology and prevent loops. BPDU protection and BPDU filtering are two features that can be configured on AOS-CX switch ports to enhance security and performance.
BPDU protection is a feature that disables a port if it receives a BPDU, indicating that an unauthorized switch or device has been connected to the port. BPDU protection is typically used on edge ports, which are ports that connect to end devices such as PCs or printers, and are not expected to receive BPDUs. BPDU protection prevents rogue devices from connecting to the network and affecting the spanning tree topology.
BPDU filtering is a feature that prevents a port from sending or receiving BPDUs, effectively isolating the port from the spanning tree topology. BPDU filtering is typically used on inter-switch ports, which are ports that connect to other switches, for specialized use cases such as creating a separate spanning tree domain or reducing the overhead of BPDUs. BPDU filtering should be used with caution, as it can create loops or inconsistencies in the network.
You can find more information about how to configure BPDU protection and BPDU filtering on AOS-CX switch ports in the [Configuring Spanning Tree Protocol - Aruba] page and the [AOS-CX Switching Configuration Guide] page. The other options are not correct because they either use BPDU protection or BPDU filtering on the wrong type of ports or for the wrong purpose. For example, using BPDU protection on inter-switch ports would disable the ports if they receive BPDUs, which are expected in normal operation.
Using BPDU filtering on edge ports would allow rogue devices to connect to the network and create loops or affect the spanning tree topology.
NEW QUESTION # 43
Refer to the scenario.
A customer has asked you to review their AOS-CX switches for potential vulnerabilities. The configuration for these switches is shown below:
What is one immediate remediation that you should recommend?
- A. Changing the switch's DNS server to the mgmt VRF
- B. Setting the clock manually instead of using NTP
- C. Either disabling DHCPv4-snoopinq or leaving it enabled, but also enabling ARP inspection
- D. Disabling Telnet
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 44
Refer to the scenario.
A customer has an Aruba ClearPass cluster. The customer has AOS-CX switches that implement 802.1X authentication to ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM).
Switches are using local port-access policies.
The customer wants to start tunneling wired clients that pass user authentication only to an Aruba gateway cluster. The gateway cluster should assign these clients to the "eth-internet" role. The gateway should also handle assigning clients to their VLAN, which is VLAN 20.
The plan for the enforcement policy and profiles is shown below:
The gateway cluster has two gateways with these IP addresses:
* Gateway 1
o VLAN 4085 (system IP) = 10.20.4.21
o VLAN 20 (users) = 10.20.20.1
o VLAN 4094 (WAN) = 198.51.100.14
* Gateway 2
o VLAN 4085 (system IP) = 10.20.4.22
o VLAN 20 (users) = 10.20.20.2
o VLAN 4094 (WAN) = 198.51.100.12
* VRRP on VLAN 20 = 10.20.20.254
The customer requires high availability for the tunnels between the switches and the gateway cluster. If one gateway falls, the other gateway should take over its tunnels. Also, the switch should be able to discover the gateway cluster regardless of whether one of the gateways is in the cluster.
Assume that you are using the "myzone" name for the UBT zone.
Which is a valid minimal configuration for the AOS-CX port-access roles?
- A. port-access role internet-only gateway-zone zone myzone gateway-role eth-internet
- B. port-access role eth-internet gateway-zone zone myzone gateway-role eth-internet vlan access 20
- C. port-access role eth-internet gateway-zone zone myzone gateway-role eth-user
- D. port-access role internet-only gateway-zone zone myzone gateway-role eth-internet vlan access 20
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The UBT solution requires that the edge ports on the switches are configured in VLAN trunk mode, not access mode. This is because the UBT solution uses a special VLAN (VLAN 4095 by default) to encapsulate the user traffic and tunnel it to the gateway. The edge ports need to allow this VLAN as well as any other VLANs that are used for management or control traffic. Therefore, the edge ports should be configured as VLAN trunk ports and allow the necessary VLANs1
NEW QUESTION # 45
Refer to the scenario.
An organization wants the AOS-CX switch to trigger an alert if its RADIUS server (cp.acnsxtest.local) rejects an unusual number of client authentication requests per hour. After some discussions with other Aruba admins, you are still not sure how many rejections are usual or unusual. You expect that the value could be different on each switch.
You are helping the developer understand how to develop an NAE script for this use case.
The developer explains that they plan to define the rule with logic like this:
monitor > value
However, the developer asks you what value to include.
What should you recommend?
- A. Defining a baseline and referring to it for the value
- B. Defining a parameter and referring to it (self ^ramsfname]) for the value
- C. Checking one of the access switches' RADIUS statistics and adding 10 to the number listed for rejects
- D. Using 10 (per hour) as a good starting point for the value
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
This is because a parameter is a variable that can be defined and modified by the user or the script, and can be used to customize the behavior and output of the NAE script. A parameter can be referred to by using the syntax self ^ramsfname], where ramsfname is the name of the parameter.
By defining a parameter for the value, the developer can make the NAE script more flexible and adaptable to different scenarios and switches. The parameter can be set to a default value, such as 10, but it can also be changed by the user or the script based on the network conditions and requirements. For example, the parameter can be adjusted dynamically based on the average or standard deviation of the number of rejects per hour, or based on the feedback from the user or other admins. This way, the NAE script can trigger an alert only when the number of rejects is truly unusual and not just arbitrary.
A: Checking one of the access switches' RADIUS statistics and adding 10 to the number listed for rejects. This is not a good recommendation because it does not account for the variability and diversity of the network environment and switches. The number of rejects listed for one switch might not be representative or relevant for another switch, as different switches might have different traffic patterns, client types, RADIUS configurations, etc. Moreover, adding 10 to the number of rejects is an arbitrary and fixed value that might not reflect the actual threshold for triggering an alert.
B: Defining a baseline and referring to it for the value. This is not a bad recommendation, but it is not as good as defining a parameter. A baseline is a reference point that represents the normal or expected state of a network metric or performance indicator. A baseline can be used to compare and contrast the current network situation and detect any anomalies or deviations. However, a baseline might not be easy or accurate to define, as it might require historical data, statistical analysis, or expert judgment. Moreover, a baseline might not be stable or constant, as it might change over time due to network growth, evolution, or optimization.
C: Using 10 (per hour) as a good starting point for the value. This is not a good recommendation because it is an arbitrary and fixed value that might not reflect the actual threshold for triggering an alert. Using 10 (per hour) as the value might result in false positives or false negatives, depending on the network conditions and switches. For example, if the normal number of rejects per hour is 5, then using 10 as the value might trigger an alert too frequently and unnecessarily. On the other hand, if the normal number of rejects per hour is 15, then using 10 as the value might miss some important alerts and risks.
NEW QUESTION # 46
......
Real Updated HPE6-A84 Questions Pass Your Exam Easily: https://exams4sure.briandumpsprep.com/HPE6-A84-prep-exam-braindumps.html
